Map of Australia, with shading legend distinguishing the number of at-risk communities identified over the number of communities screened and trachoma prevalence in 2011
Western Australia
* Kimberley Region – 30 of 35 at-risk communities were screened with a prevalence of between 5 percent of greater and less than 10 percent
* Pilbara Region – 16 of 18 at-risk communities were screened with a prevalence of between 5 percent of greater and less than 10 percent
* Midwest Region – 8 of 8 at-risk communities were screened with a prevalence of between 5 percent of greater and less than 10 percent
* Goldfields Region – 14 of 14 at-risk communities were screened with a prevalence of between 10 percent of greater and less than 20 percent
Northern Territory
* Darwin Rural Region – 15 of 17 at-risk communities were screened with a prevalence of less than 5 percent
* East Arnhem Region – 7 of 12 at-risk communities were screened with a prevalence of less than 5 percent
* Katherine Region -  9 of 17 at-risk communities were screened with a prevalence of less than 5 percent
* Barkly Region – 8 of 10 at-risk communities were screened with a prevalence of between 5 percent of greater and less than 10 percent
* Alice Springs Remote – 26 of 30 at-risk communities were screened with a prevalence of between 10 percent of greater and less than 20 percent
South Australia
* Far North Region -  14 of 23 at-risk communities were screened with a prevalence of less than 5 percent
Eyre and Western Region – 5 of 23 at-risk communities were screened with a prevalence of between 5 percent of greater and less than 10 percent